ISSN 1003-8280 CN 10-1522/R 中国疾病预防控制中心 主办
Objective Three suspected brucellosis cases were investigated in Suizhou city of Hubei province, and three suspected Brucella strains were identified. Methods Field investigation was applied to finish Brucella epidemiological survey, used Brucella conventional appraisal classification method and the phage cracking test for testing. BCSP31-PCR method (Based on Brucella genus specific gene BCSP31 target gene detection method), AMOS-PCR (based on electrophoresis banding identify B. abortus biovar 1, 2, 4 of Brucella, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis biovar 1) and Real-time PCR, three molecular classification method were compared. Results Three patients were infected by close contact with sick animals and their meat, conventional identification and a variety of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had the same results, B. melitensis biovar 3. Conclusion Brucella melitensis biovar 3 was identified as the pathogen of the three cases from Suizhou city and cases were mainly caused by direct contact with sick animals and their meat.
【Abstract】 Objective To study the method to identify Brucella suis biovar 1 wild strain and S2 vaccine strain. Methods A total of 21 strains of B.suis biovar 1 wild strain were analyzed by AMOS-PCR, PFGE and multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). Results B.suis biovar 1 and S2 could be discriminated by MLVA Bru9 and Bru16. Conclusion The MLVA assay can be applied to identification of wild strains and vaccine strain and can be proposed to as a complement of classical biotyping methods.